A.D. Drumm Images, LLC – Landscape, Portrait, and Fine Art Photography in Rochester MN Photography

June 26, 2012

Tutorial Tuesday – Depth of Field

Filed under: Tutorials — Tony Drumm @ 7:40 pm

I thought it might be fun to set aside my normal blog subjects and do something more like a tutorial on some aspect of shooting. What better day for a tutorial than Tuesday, I reckon!

The subject for this little tutorial is depth of field, or maybe, aperture. We often like to refer to an exposure triangle made up of shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. These three settings work together as a team to determine the exposure of a photograph. How bright or how dark the image is. What settings should we use? I could devote a rather lengthy blog post or two or many on exposure.

But today, lets just discuss aperture. This setting, in many ways, is arguably the one that sets the tone and emotion of most photographs. It’s really that important. I prefer to shoot in manual mode to control all three settings directly, but many pros rely heavily on Aperture-priority automatic mode. They want to take advantage of the terrific technology we hold in our hands, but controlling the aperture is considered critical.

When the aperture value – the number – is low, the opening allowing light through the lens to the sensor is large. This produces a shallow depth-of-field or depth-of-focus (DOF). That’s what I used for the photo of the blossoms above – the largest opening I could with that lens. In this case, it was f/2.0. Shallow DOF means very little is in focus. As we stray closer or farther from the camera, things become blurry.

Why is that important? We suffer in photography from having a 2D static image to present our viewers a glimpse into something we saw, something we felt. Having only the main subject in focus helps to pull the viewer to what we want them to see.

Sports shots are great examples. Why do the pro photos in sports magazines look so much better than the common shots we see of local sports? A big reason is making use of shallow depth of field. We don’t really want to showcase the spectators in  the stands behind the players. We don’t even really care about the players back away from the action. By using a shallow DOF, we keep the focus – literally – on what’s important.

Aperture is key here. However, it’s not the only thing that determines the DOF. The lens makes a difference. A long telephoto lens tends to produce shallower DOF than a short wide angle lens at the same aperture setting. And, the farther the subject is from the camera, the wider the DOF. Photographers who shoot close-ups often have to struggle to achieve a DOF wide enough to keep all of the subject in focus.

Also, some lenses have a smaller maximum opening. We call those slower lenses and those with a larger maximum faster lenses. Faster lenses are more expensive. Sometimes, they are hugely expensive. They are harder to make especially to make well – meaning they produce good quality images.

We don’t always want shallow depth of field, either. We can shoot a portrait with one eye in focus and one eye out of focus. It’s a choice and it sometimes is what I might want. But not always. So, knowing how aperture, distance, and lens combine to produce the DOF I want is important. And, you can see that maybe it’s something I don’t want to leave to the camera to decide. It just doesn’t know what I’m actually trying to do.

Commonly, we’ll use a wide DOF for landscape images. Not always, but often. We might use f/11, f/16, f/22. Remember, larger numbers mean smaller opening and wider DOF.

And for an environmental portrait, a wide DOF might be appropriate. We want to showcase the environment, show how our subject really is in this place and what that place is. We’ll use other techniques to pull the viewer to the subject like leading lines above (which all lead to the subject).

DOF really is one of the keys that takes your photos from snapshots to a level above, photos that just look better. When you’re looking at good photos, ones that pull you, make you go “Wow!” – take a moment to study how the photographer achieved that. How was DOF used to make the photo better?

Next time you’re shooting, take the camera off auto-everything or even “P” (for program – not professional!), and set it to aperture priority (Av for us Canon shooters). Set an aperture and shoot. Change it up, shoot some more. Try using the largest setting your lens offers for a while shooting nearby subjects, far away subjects. Learn how this one setting affects your photos.

June 24, 2012

The Sound of Music

Filed under: General photography — Tony Drumm @ 9:22 am

Riverland’s summer theatre, Summerset Theatre, began its season with The Sound of Music, the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical. We all mostly know this show from the Robert Wise film, which I, ahem, saw when it was released. The original stage version differs here and there from the film, as is typical. I saw a production of the show a few years ago up in the Twin Cities, which I vaguely remember having more closely followed the film than the original stage version.

Capturing images from such a well known show is interesting. There are some iconic scenes that I want to grab.

It’s great when there’s a moment with expressions that fill the frame with joy and fun, and I think this shot with Maria and the children is my favorite. I was fortunate to be in a good position to see all the faces as they were laughing.

Dances are challenging to capture with just stage lights. Even with a modern camera that practically sees in the dark, the lights can be a bit less than ideal, and the fast movement can produce a lot of blur. Sometimes, that’s okay, but it’s good to be ready for the pauses that can produce a crisper result. This is different from shooting a wedding, where I might have a strobe or two positioned to provide some good light.

I mostly like to get in tight if possible, even at the expense of losing some of the players. But I think it’s nice to have at least a few wider shots to show some of the set and convey the fact that this really is a stage show. The Riverland theatre has stadium seating, so I can run up a bit and get a nice overview of the stage. For Sound of Music, the orhestra was arranged just in front of the stage allowing me to showcase them as well as the actors.

As I mentioned, this show is very well known, and most viewers could guess this shot is during Climb Every Mountain.

The shot of The Captain singing during the festival shortly before the Trapp family makes their escape from Austria is another I particularly like. If you follow my posts about shooting show photos, you’ll find this set-up is familiar. I like placing the secondary player or players behind the primary character, slightly out of focus, providing support. It’s just visually appealing to me, I guess.

Summerset has a couple more shows, both opening in July. You can find out more here. When you tire of the summer movies, take some time and see live actors perform on stage. For those in Rochester, it’s a quick drive to Austin.

June 12, 2012

Instruments for Photographic Music

Filed under: General photography — Tony Drumm @ 7:16 pm

I was attending a concert the other day. Before the concert began, there are various guitars and keyboards, and of course, the drum set  propped up on stage. I’m sitting there looking at the musical instruments, and I started down one of those trains-of-thought. You know those trains – they like to derail and go off in their own favorite direction.

I started thinking about how we photographers generally refer to our cameras, equipment, and software as tools.

We like to say, this lens is just a tool we use to make a photograph. A better lens won’t make a bad photographer suddenly good. That sort of thing.

But as I sat there, I decided a better descriptor might be instrument. I like the metaphor of visual music. It feels right. We blend light and color, and indeed we use the term tone, to create our photographs. They can evoke emotions of calm, serenity, perhaps even love. Or, they can be discordant evoking strong reactions of sadness, pain like the Chernobyl images of Paul Fusco.

Perhaps it’s just words – tools or instruments. But I like the latter. It says more to me about these pieces of software and hardware, and it helps explain why we look for new instruments to help us make our music a bit richer. A great pianist can bang out a wonderful tune on a modest piano, but when she touches the ivories of a well tuned, lovingly built instrument, we’re carried to another place.

Powered by WordPress